Help Center>
Cloud Service Engine>
FAQs>
ServiceComb Engines>
Why Are Microservice Development Framework and Netty Versions Unmatched?
Updated on 2023-11-08 GMT+08:00
Why Are Microservice Development Framework and Netty Versions Unmatched?
Symptom
During development of a microservice application, the following error is displayed:
"Caused by: java.lang.NoSuchMethodError: io.netty.handler.codec.http.websocketx.WebSocketClientHandshakerFactory.newHandshaker(Ljava/net/URI;Lio/netty/handler/codec/http/websocketx/WebSocketVersion;Ljava/lang/String;ZLio/netty/handler/codec/http/HttpHeaders;IZZJ)Lio/netty/handler/codec/http/websocketx/WebSocketClientHandshaker;"
Possible Cause
Third-party software introduced a mismatched version dependency.
Solution
Run the mvn dependency:tree command in the development environment to view the dependency tree and check whether the microservice development framework and Netty versions are matched.
For ServiceComb 2.0.1 development framework, the matched Netty version is 4.1.45.Final.
Parent topic: ServiceComb Engines
ServiceComb Engines FAQs
- How Do I Perform Local Development and Testing?
- How Can I Handle a Certificate Loading Error?
- What If the Header Name Is Invalid?
- What Is the Performance Loss of Mesher?
- Why Is "Version validate failed" Displayed When I Attempt to Connect to the Service Center?
- Why Is "Not enough quota" Displayed When I Attempt to Connect to the Service Center?
- What Should I Do If the Service Registration Fails After IPv6 Is Enabled for the Exclusive ServiceComb Engine with Security Authentication Enabled?
- What Is Service Name Duplication Check?
- Why Do I Have to Define Service Contracts?
- Why Are Microservice Development Framework and Netty Versions Unmatched?
- What Do I Need to Know Before Upgrading an Exclusive ServiceComb Engine?
- What Must I Check Before Migrating Services from the Professional to the Exclusive Microservice Engine?
- Why Is "Duplicate cluster name" Displayed?
- Error Message "the subnet could not be found" Is Displayed When the Access Address Fails to Be Processed During Engine Creation
- Why Is Error "does not match rule: {Max: 100, Regexp: ^[a-zA-Z0-9]{1,160}$|^[a-zA-Z0-9][a-zA-Z0-9_\-.]{0,158}[a-zA-Z0-9]$}"}" Reported?
- What Should I Do If SpringCloud Applications Fail to Connect to the Configuration Center of ServiceComb Engine 2.x?
- Why Could My the Global Configuration Not Be Modified?
- Obtain Configurations Failed
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Provide feedbackThank you very much for your feedback. We will continue working to improve the documentation.See the reply and handling status in My Cloud VOC.
The system is busy. Please try again later.
For any further questions, feel free to contact us through the chatbot.
Chatbotmore
