Optimizing Statement Pushdown
Statement Pushdown
Currently, the GaussDB optimizer can use three methods to develop statement execution policies in the distributed framework: generating a statement pushdown plan, a distributed execution plan, or a distributed execution plan for sending statements.
- A statement pushdown plan pushes query statements from a CN down to DNs for execution and returns the execution results to the CN.
- In a distributed execution plan, a CN compiles and optimizes query statements, generates a plan tree, and then sends the plan tree to DNs for execution. After the statements have been executed, execution results will be returned to the CN.
- A distributed execution plan for sending statements pushes queries that can be pushed down (mostly base table scanning statements) to DNs for execution. Then, the plan obtains the intermediate results and sends them to the CN, on which the remaining queries are to be executed.
The third policy sends many intermediate results from DNs to the CN for further execution. In this case, the CN performance bottleneck (in bandwidth, storage, and computing) is caused by statements that cannot be pushed down to DNs. Therefore, you are not advised to use the query statements where only the third policy applies.
Statements cannot be pushed down to DNs if they have functions that do not support pushdown or syntax that does not support pushdown. Generally, you can rewrite the execution statements to solve the problem.
Typical Scenarios of Statement Pushdown
In the GaussDB optimizer, if you want to support statement pushdown, set the GUC parameter enable_fast_query_shipping to on. Generally, no execution plan operator is displayed after the EXPLAIN statement. If the keyword "Data Node Scan on" in the execution plan is displayed in the first line (excluding the plan format), the statement has been pushed down to DNs for execution. The following describes statement pushdown and its supported scope from three scenarios.
1. Pushdown of single-table query statements
In a distributed database, to query a single table, whether the current statement can be pushed down depends on whether the CN needs to participate in calculation instead of simply collecting data. If the CN needs to further calculate the DN result, the statement cannot be pushed down. Generally, statements with keywords such as agg, windows function, limit/offset, sort, distinct cannot be pushed down.
- Pushdown: Simple queries can be pushed down without further calculation on the CN.
openGauss=# explain select * from t where c1 > 1; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Data Node Scan on "__REMOTE_FQS_QUERY__" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0) Node/s: All datanodes (2 rows)
- Non-pushdown: A CN with the limit clause cannot simply send statements to DNs and collect data, which is inconsistent with the semantics of the limit clause.
openGauss=# explain select * from t limit 1; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Limit (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=12) -> Data Node Scan on "__REMOTE_LIMIT_QUERY__" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=1 width=12) Node/s: All datanodes (3 rows)
- Non-pushdown: A CN with the aggregate function cannot simply push down statements. Instead, it needs to further aggregate the results collected from DNs.
openGauss=# explain select sum(c1), count(*) from t; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate (cost=0.10..0.11 rows=1 width=20) -> Data Node Scan on "__REMOTE_GROUP_QUERY__" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=20 width=4) Node/s: All datanodes (3 rows)
2. Pushdown of multi-table query statements
- Create two hash distribution tables.
openGauss=# create table t(c1 int, c2 int, c3 int)distribute by hash(c1); CREATE TABLE openGauss=# create table t1(c1 int, c2 int, c3 int)distribute by hash(c1); CREATE TABLE
- Pushdown: The join condition meets the hash distribution column attributes of two tables.
openGauss=# explain select * from t1 join t on t.c1 = t1.c1; QUERY PLAN ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Data Node Scan on "__REMOTE_FQS_QUERY__" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0) Node/s: All datanodes (2 rows)
- Non-pushdown: The join condition does not meet the hash distribution column attribute. That is, t1.c2 is not the distribution column of t1.
openGauss=# explain select * from t1 join t on t.c1 = t1.c2; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hash Join (cost=0.25..0.53 rows=20 width=24) Hash Cond: (t1.c2 = t.c1) -> Data Node Scan on t1 "_REMOTE_TABLE_QUERY_" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=20 width=12) Node/s: All datanodes -> Hash (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=20 width=12) -> Data Node Scan on t "_REMOTE_TABLE_QUERY_" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=20 width=12) Node/s: All datanodes (7 rows)
3. Special scenarios
In some special scenarios, for example, a statement containing the with recursive clause or a column-store table cannot be pushed down.
Checking Whether the Execution Plan Has Been Pushed Down to DNs
Perform the following procedure to quickly determine whether the execution plan can be pushed down to DNs:
- Set the GUC parameter enable_fast_query_shipping to off to use the distributed framework policy for the query optimizer.
1
SET enable_fast_query_shipping = off;
- View the execution plan.
If the execution plan contains Data Node Scan nodes, the execution plan is a distributed execution plan for sending statements and cannot be pushed down. If the execution plan contains Streaming nodes, the SQL statements can be pushed down to DNs.
For example:
1 2 3 4 5
select count(ss.ss_sold_date_sk order by ss.ss_sold_date_sk)c1 from store_sales ss, store_returns sr where sr.sr_customer_sk = ss.ss_customer_sk;
The execution plan is as follows, which indicates that the SQL statement cannot be pushed down.
QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Aggregate -> Hash Join Hash Cond: (ss.ss_customer_sk = sr.sr_customer_sk) -> Data Node Scan on store_sales "_REMOTE_TABLE_QUERY_" Node/s: All datanodes -> Hash -> Data Node Scan on store_returns "_REMOTE_TABLE_QUERY_" Node/s: All datanodes (8 rows)
Syntax That Does Not Support Pushdown
SQL syntax that does not support pushdown is described using the following table definition examples:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 |
openGauss=# CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER1 ( C_CUSTKEY BIGINT NOT NULL , C_NAME VARCHAR(25) NOT NULL , C_ADDRESS VARCHAR(40) NOT NULL , C_NATIONKEY INT NOT NULL , C_PHONE CHAR(15) NOT NULL , C_ACCTBAL DECIMAL(15,2) NOT NULL , C_MKTSEGMENT CHAR(10) NOT NULL , C_COMMENT VARCHAR(117) NOT NULL ) DISTRIBUTE BY hash(C_CUSTKEY); openGauss=# CREATE TABLE test_stream(a int, b float);--float does not support redistribution. openGauss=# CREATE TABLE sal_emp ( c1 integer[] ) DISTRIBUTE BY replication; |
- The returning statement cannot be pushed down.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
openGauss=# explain update customer1 set C_NAME = 'a' returning c_name; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Update on customer1 (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=30 width=187) Node/s: All datanodes Node expr: c_custkey -> Data Node Scan on customer1 "_REMOTE_TABLE_QUERY_" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=30 width=187) Node/s: All datanodes (5 rows)
- If a SQL statement contains the aggregate functions using ORDER BY, this statement cannot be pushed down.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
openGauss=# explain verbose select count ( c_custkey order by c_custkey) from customer1; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Aggregate (cost=2.50..2.51 rows=1 width=8) Output: count(customer1.c_custkey ORDER BY customer1.c_custkey) -> Data Node Scan on customer1 "_REMOTE_TABLE_QUERY_" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=30 width=8) Output: customer1.c_custkey Node/s: All datanodes Remote query: SELECT c_custkey FROM ONLY public.customer1 WHERE true (6 rows)
- If a SQL statement contains COUNT(DISTINCT expr) and columns in COUNT(DISTINCT expr) do not support redistribution, this statement cannot be pushed down.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
openGauss=# explain verbose select count(distinct b) from test_stream; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Aggregate (cost=2.50..2.51 rows=1 width=8) Output: count(DISTINCT test_stream.b) -> Data Node Scan on test_stream "_REMOTE_TABLE_QUERY_" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=30 width=8) Output: test_stream.b Node/s: All datanodes Remote query: SELECT b FROM ONLY public.test_stream WHERE true (6 rows)
- A statement containing DISTINCT ON cannot be pushed down.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
openGauss=# explain verbose select distinct on (c_custkey) c_custkey from customer1 order by c_custkey; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Unique (cost=49.83..54.83 rows=30 width=8) Output: customer1.c_custkey -> Sort (cost=49.83..52.33 rows=30 width=8) Output: customer1.c_custkey Sort Key: customer1.c_custkey -> Data Node Scan on customer1 "_REMOTE_TABLE_QUERY_" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=30 width=8) Output: customer1.c_custkey Node/s: All datanodes Remote query: SELECT c_custkey FROM ONLY public.customer1 WHERE true (9 rows)
- A statement containing array expressions cannot be pushed down.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
openGauss=# explain verbose select array[c_custkey,1] from customer1 order by c_custkey; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------ Sort (cost=49.83..52.33 rows=30 width=8) Output: (ARRAY[customer1.c_custkey, 1::bigint]), customer1.c_custkey Sort Key: customer1.c_custkey -> Data Node Scan on "__REMOTE_SORT_QUERY__" (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=30 width=8) Output: (ARRAY[customer1.c_custkey, 1::bigint]), customer1.c_custkey Node/s: All datanodes Remote query: SELECT ARRAY[c_custkey, 1::bigint], c_custkey FROM ONLY public.customer1 WHERE true ORDER BY 2 (7 rows)
- The following table describes the scenarios where a statement containing WITH RECURSIVE cannot be pushed down in the current version, as well as the causes.
No.
Scenario
Cause of Not Supporting Pushdown
1
The query contains foreign tables.
LOG: SQL can't be shipped, reason: RecursiveUnion contains ForeignScan is not shippable (In this table, LOG describes the cause of not supporting pushdown.)
In the current version, queries containing foreign tables do not support pushdown.
2
Multiple node groups
LOG: SQL can't be shipped, reason: With-Recursive under multi-nodegroup scenario is not shippable
In the current version, pushdown is supported only when all base tables are stored and computed in the same node group.
3
ALL is not used for UNION. In this case, the return result is deduplicated.
LOG: SQL can't be shipped, reason: With-Recursive does not contain "ALL" to bind recursive & none-recursive branches
For example:
WITH recursive t_result AS ( SELECT dm,sj_dm,name,1 as level FROM test_rec_part WHERE sj_dm > 10 UNION SELECT t2.dm,t2.sj_dm,t2.name||' > '||t1.name,t1.level+1 FROM t_result t1 JOIN test_rec_part t2 ON t2.sj_dm = t1.dm ) SELECT * FROM t_result t;
4
A base table contains the system catalog.
LOG: SQL can't be shipped, reason: With-Recursive contains system table is not shippable
For example:
WITH RECURSIVE x(id) AS ( select count(1) from pg_class where oid=1247 UNION ALL SELECT id+1 FROM x WHERE id < 5 ), y(id) AS ( select count(1) from pg_class where oid=1247 UNION ALL SELECT id+1 FROM x WHERE id < 10 ) SELECT y.*, x.* FROM y LEFT JOIN x USING (id) ORDER BY 1;
5
Only VALUES is used for scanning base tables. In this case, the statement can be executed on the CN, and DNs are unnecessary.
LOG: SQL can't be shipped, reason: With-Recursive contains only values rte is not shippable
For example:
WITH RECURSIVE t(n) AS ( VALUES (1) UNION ALL SELECT n+1 FROM t WHERE n < 100 ) SELECT sum(n) FROM t;
6
Only the recursion part has correlation conditions of correlated subqueries, and the non-recursion part has no correlation condition.
LOG: SQL can't be shipped, reason: With-Recursive recursive term correlated only is not shippable
For example:
select a.ID,a.Name, ( with recursive cte as ( select ID, PID, NAME from b where b.ID = 1 union all select parent.ID,parent.PID,parent.NAME from cte as child join b as parent on child.pid=parent.id where child.ID = a.ID ) select NAME from cte limit 1 ) cName from ( select id, name, count(*) as cnt from a group by id,name ) a order by 1,2;
7
The replicate plan is used for limit in the non-recursion part but the hash plan is used in the recursion part, resulting in conflicts.
LOG: SQL can't be shipped, reason: With-Recursive contains conflict distribution in none-recursive(Replicate) recursive(Hash)
For example:
WITH recursive t_result AS ( select * from( SELECT dm,sj_dm,name,1 as level FROM test_rec_part WHERE sj_dm < 10 order by dm limit 6 offset 2) UNION all SELECT t2.dm,t2.sj_dm,t2.name||' > '||t1.name,t1.level+1 FROM t_result t1 JOIN test_rec_part t2 ON t2.sj_dm = t1.dm ) SELECT * FROM t_result t;
8
recursive of multiple-layers are nested. That is, a recursive is nested in the recursion part of another recursive.
LOG: SQL can't be shipped, reason: Recursive CTE references recursive CTE "cte"
For example:
with recursive cte as ( select * from rec_tb4 where id<4 union all select h.id,h.parentID,h.name from ( with recursive cte as ( select * from rec_tb4 where id<4 union all select h.id,h.parentID,h.name from rec_tb4 h inner join cte c on h.id=c.parentID ) SELECT id ,parentID,name from cte order by parentID ) h inner join cte c on h.id=c.parentID ) SELECT id ,parentID,name from cte order by parentID,1,2,3;
Functions That Do Not Support Pushdown
The following describes the volatility of functions. In GaussDB, every function has a volatility classification, with the possibilities being:
- IMMUTABLE
Indicates that the function always returns the same result if the parameter values are the same.
- STABLE
Indicates that the function cannot modify the database, and that within a single table scan it will consistently return the same result for the same parameter value, but its result varies by SQL statements.
- VOLATILE
Indicates that the function value can change in a single table scan and no optimization is performed.
The volatility of a function can be obtained by querying for its provolatile column in pg_proc. The value i indicates immutable, s indicates stable, and v indicates volatile. The valid values of the proshippable column in pg_proc are t, f, and NULL. This column and the provolatile column together describe whether a function is pushed down.
- If the provolatile of a function is i, the function can be pushed down regardless of the value of proshippable.
- If the provolatile of a function is s or v, the function can be pushed only if the value of proshippable is t.
- CTEs containing random, exec_hadoop_sql, or exec_on_extension are not pushed down, because pushdown may lead to incorrect results.
When creating a customized function, you can specify the values of provolatile and proshippable. For details, see CREATE FUNCTION.
In scenarios where a function does not support pushdown, perform one of the following as required:
- If it is a system function, replace it with a functionally equivalent one.
- If it is a customized function, check whether its provolatile and proshippable are correctly defined.
Example: Customized Functions
Define a customized function that generates fixed output for a certain input as the immutable type.
Take the sales information of TPC Benchmark DS (TPC-DS) as an example. If you want to write a function to calculate the discount data of a product, you can define the function as follows:
1 2 3 4 |
CREATE FUNCTION func_percent_2 (NUMERIC, NUMERIC) RETURNS NUMERIC AS 'SELECT $1 / $2 WHERE $2 > 0.01' LANGUAGE SQL VOLATILE; |
Run the following statement:
1 2 |
SELECT func_percent_2(ss_sales_price, ss_list_price) FROM store_sales; |
The execution plan is as follows:
func_percent_2 is not pushed down, and ss_sales_price and ss_list_price are executed on a CN. In this case, a large amount of resources on the CN is consumed, and the performance deteriorates as a result.
In this example, the function generates the same output when the same input is provided. Therefore, we can modify the function to the following one:
1 2 3 4 |
CREATE FUNCTION func_percent_1 (NUMERIC, NUMERIC) RETURNS NUMERIC AS 'SELECT $1 / $2 WHERE $2 > 0.01' LANGUAGE SQL IMMUTABLE; |
Run the following statement:
1 2 |
SELECT func_percent_1(ss_sales_price, ss_list_price) FROM store_sales; |
The execution plan is as follows:
func_percent_1 is pushed down to DNs for quicker execution. (In TPC-DS 1000X, where three CNs and 18 DNs are used, the query efficiency is improved by over 100 times).
Example 2: Pushing Down the Sorting Operation
For details, see Case: Pushing Down Sort Operations to DNs.
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Provide feedbackThank you very much for your feedback. We will continue working to improve the documentation.See the reply and handling status in My Cloud VOC.
For any further questions, feel free to contact us through the chatbot.
Chatbot