更新时间:2026-08-06 GMT+08:00
操作步骤
无索引和有索引性能对比
- 使用root用户登录数据库。
- 查看test_table表执行计划。
gaussdb=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM test_table WHERE email = 'user_500000@example.com'; QUERY PLAN -------------------------------------------------- Data Node Scan (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0) Node/s: All datanodes (2 rows) Time: 167.579 ms从执行结果来看,执行时间需要167.579ms。
- 创建索引。
gaussdb=# CREATE INDEX idx_test_table_email ON test_table(email); CREATE INDEX
- 再次查看test_table表执行计划。
gaussdb=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM test_table WHERE email = 'user_500000@example.com'; QUERY PLAN --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Data Node Scan (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0) Node/s: All datanodes Remote SQL: SELECT id, name, email, created_at FROM public.test_table WHERE email::text = 'user_500000@example.com'::text Datanode Name: dn_6001 [Bypass] Index Scan using idx_test_table_email on test_table (cost=0.00..2.47 rows=1 width=46) Index Cond: ((email)::text = 'user_500000@example.com'::text) Datanode Name: dn_6002 [Bypass] Index Scan using idx_test_table_email on test_table (cost=0.00..2.47 rows=1 width=46) Index Cond: ((email)::text = 'user_500000@example.com'::text) (14 rows) Time: 18.467 ms添加索引后,通过与无索引时执行计划的对比,查询时间从原来的167.579ms缩短到18.467ms。
单列索引和复合索引的性能对比
- 使用root用户登录数据库。
- 创建单列索引。
gaussdb=# CREATE INDEX idx_region ON sales_records(region_id); CREATE INDEX gaussdb=# CREATE INDEX idx_store ON sales_records(store_id); CREATE INDEX
- 查看执行计划。
gaussdb=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM sales_records WHERE region_id = 5 AND store_id = 42; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Data Node Scan (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0) Node/s: All datanodes Remote SQL: SELECT record_id, region_id, store_id, product_id, sale_date, amount, is_refund FROM public.sales_records WHERE region_id = 5 AND store_id = 42 Datanode Name: dn_6001 Bitmap Heap Scan on sales_records (cost=1354.75..2501.82 rows=1160 width=31) Recheck Cond: ((store_id = 42) AND (region_id = 5)) -> BitmapAnd (cost=1354.75..1354.75 rows=1160 width=0) -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_store (cost=0.00..118.79 rows=10526 width=0) Index Cond: (store_id = 42) -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_region (cost=0.00..1235.13 rows=110237 width=0) Index Cond: (region_id = 5) Datanode Name: dn_6002 Bitmap Heap Scan on sales_records (cost=1325.15..2406.59 rows=1087 width=31) Recheck Cond: ((store_id = 42) AND (region_id = 5)) -> BitmapAnd (cost=1325.15..1325.15 rows=1087 width=0) -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_store (cost=0.00..113.05 rows=10053 width=0) Index Cond: (store_id = 42) -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_region (cost=0.00..1211.31 rows=108088 width=0) Index Cond: (region_id = 5) (22 rows) Time: 28.455 ms从执行结果来看,执行时间需要28.455ms。
- 创建复合索引。
gaussdb=# CREATE INDEX idx_region_store ON sales_records(region_id, store_id); CREATE INDEX
- 再次查看执行计划。
gaussdb=# EXPLAIN ANALYZE SELECT * FROM sales_records WHERE region_id = 5 AND store_id = 42; QUERY PLAN ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Data Node Scan (cost=0.00..0.00 rows=0 width=0) Node/s: All datanodes Remote SQL: SELECT record_id, region_id, store_id, product_id, sale_date, amount, is_refund FROM public.sales_records WHERE region_id = 5 AND store_id = 42 Datanode Name: dn_6001 Bitmap Heap Scan on sales_records (cost=16.54..1163.61 rows=1160 width=31) Recheck Cond: ((region_id = 5) AND (store_id = 42)) -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_region_store (cost=0.00..16.25 rows=1160 width=0) Index Cond: ((region_id = 5) AND (store_id = 42)) Datanode Name: dn_6002 Bitmap Heap Scan on sales_records (cost=15.79..1097.23 rows=1087 width=31) Recheck Cond: ((region_id = 5) AND (store_id = 42)) -> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_region_store (cost=0.00..15.52 rows=1087 width=0) Index Cond: ((region_id = 5) AND (store_id = 42)) (16 rows) Time: 6.856 ms通过对单列索引和复合索引执行计划的对比,查询时间从原来的28.455ms缩短到6.856ms。