Help Center> Cloud Container Engine> Best Practices> Networking> Selecting a Network Model
Updated on 2024-07-04 GMT+08:00
View PDF

Selecting a Network Model

CCE uses proprietary, high-performance container networking add-ons to support the tunnel network, Cloud Native 2.0 network, and VPC network models.

After a cluster is created, the network model cannot be changed. Exercise caution when selecting a network model.

  • Tunnel network: The container network is an overlay tunnel network on top of a VPC network and uses the VXLAN technology. This network model is applicable when there is no high requirements on performance. VXLAN encapsulates Ethernet packets as UDP packets for tunnel transmission. Though at some cost of performance, the tunnel encapsulation enables higher interoperability and compatibility with advanced features (such as network policy-based isolation), meeting the requirements of most applications.
    Figure 1 Container tunnel network
  • VPC network: The container network uses VPC routing to integrate with the underlying network. This network model is applicable to performance-intensive scenarios. The maximum number of nodes allowed in a cluster depends on the route quota in a VPC network. Each node is assigned a CIDR block of a fixed size. VPC networks are free from tunnel encapsulation overhead and outperform container tunnel networks. In addition, as VPC routing includes routes to node IP addresses and container network segment, container pods in the cluster can be directly accessed from outside the cluster.
    Figure 2 VPC network
  • Cloud Native Network 2.0: The container network deeply integrates the elastic network interface (ENI) capability of VPC, uses the VPC CIDR block to allocate container addresses, and supports passthrough networking to containers through a load balancer.
    Figure 3 Cloud Native 2.0 network

The following table lists the differences between the network models.

Table 1 Network model comparison

Dimension

Tunnel Network

VPC Network

Cloud Native Network 2.0

Application scenarios
  • Low requirements on performance: As the container tunnel network requires additional VXLAN tunnel encapsulation, it has about 5% to 15% of performance loss when compared with the other two container network models. Therefore, the container tunnel network applies to the scenarios that do not have high performance requirements, such as web applications, and middle-end and back-end services with a small number of access requests.
  • Large-scale networking: Different from the VPC network that is limited by the VPC route quota, the container tunnel network does not have any restriction on the infrastructure. In addition, the container tunnel network controls the broadcast domain to the node level. The container tunnel network supports a maximum of 2000 nodes.
  • High performance requirements: As no tunnel encapsulation is required, the VPC network model delivers the performance close to that of a VPC network when compared with the container tunnel network model. Therefore, the VPC network model applies to scenarios that have high requirements on performance, such as AI computing and big data computing.
  • Small- and medium-scale networks: Due to the limitation on VPC routing tables, it is recommended that the number of nodes in a cluster be less than or equal to 1000.
  • High performance requirements: Cloud Native 2.0 networks use VPC networks to construct container networks, eliminating the need for tunnel encapsulation or NAT when containers communicate. This makes Cloud Native 2.0 networks ideal for scenarios that demand high bandwidth and low latency, such as live streaming and e-commerce flash sales.
  • Large-scale networking: Cloud Native 2.0 networks support a maximum of 2,000 ECS nodes and 100,000 pods.

Core technology

OVS

IPvlan and VPC route

VPC ENI/sub-ENI

Applicable clusters

CCE standard cluster

CCE standard cluster

CCE Turbo cluster

Container network isolation

Kubernetes native NetworkPolicy for pods

No

Pods support security group isolation.

Interconnecting pods to a load balancer

Interconnected through a NodePort

Interconnected through a NodePort

Directly interconnected using a dedicated load balancer

Interconnected using a shared load balancer through a NodePort

Managing container IP addresses
  • Separate container CIDR blocks needed
  • Container CIDR blocks divided by node and dynamically added after being allocated
  • Separate container CIDR blocks needed
  • Container CIDR blocks divided by node and statically allocated (the allocated CIDR blocks cannot be changed after a node is created)

Container CIDR blocks divided from a VPC subnet (You do not need to configure separate container CIDR blocks.)

Network performance

Performance loss due to VXLAN encapsulation

No tunnel encapsulation, and cross-node traffic forwarded through VPC routers (The performance is so good that is comparable to that of the host network, but there is a loss caused by NAT.)

Container network integrated with VPC network, eliminating performance loss

Networking scale

A maximum of 2000 nodes are supported.

Suitable for small- and medium-scale networks due to the limitation on VPC routing tables. It is recommended that the number of nodes be less than or equal to 1000.

Each time a node is added to the cluster, a route is added to the VPC routing tables (including the default and custom ones). Evaluate the cluster scale that is limited by the VPC routing tables before creating the cluster. For details about routing tables, see Constraints.

A maximum of 2000 nodes are supported.

In a cloud-native network 2.0 cluster, containers' IP addresses are assigned from VPC CIDR blocks, and the number of containers supported is restricted by these blocks. Evaluate the cluster's scale limitations before creating it.
  1. The scale of a cluster that uses the VPC network model is limited by the custom routes of the VPC. Therefore, you need to estimate the number of required nodes before creating a cluster.
  2. By default, VPC routing network supports direct communication between containers and hosts in the same VPC. If a peering connection policy is configured between the VPC and another VPC, the containers can directly communicate with hosts on the peer VPC. In addition, in hybrid networking scenarios such as Direct Connect and VPN, communication between containers and hosts on the peer end can also be achieved with proper planning.
Parent Topic: Networking