Changing the Specifications of a Specified Node Type
Function
This API is used to modify cluster specifications. The following node types can be changed:
- ess: data node
- ess-cold: cold data node
- ess-client: client node
- ess-master: master node
URI
POST /v1.0/{project_id}/clusters/{cluster_id}/{types}/flavor
Parameter |
Mandatory |
Type |
Description |
---|---|---|---|
project_id |
Yes |
String |
Project ID. For details about how to obtain the project ID and name, see Obtaining a Project ID and Name. |
cluster_id |
Yes |
String |
ID of the cluster whose specifications you want to change. |
types |
Yes |
String |
Type of the cluster node you want to modify.
|
Request Parameters
Parameter |
Mandatory |
Type |
Description |
---|---|---|---|
needCheckReplica |
No |
Boolean |
Whether to check replicas. The value can be true or false. The check is enabled by default.
Master and client nodes are not data nodes, so they do not need to check replicas no matter this parameter is set to true or false. |
newFlavorId |
Yes |
String |
ID of the new flavor. This parameter is obtained by calling the [Obtaining the Instance Specifications List] (ListFlavors.xml) API. The API compares the values of the name attribute and obtains the ID of the flavor higher than the current flavor. Only the node specifications of the same Elasticsearch engine version can be changed. |
Response Parameters
None
Example Requests
{ "needCheckReplica" : false, "newFlavorId" : "35b060a4-f152-48ce-8773-36559ceb81f2" }
Example Responses
None
Status Codes
Status Code |
Description |
---|---|
200 |
Request succeeded. |
400 |
Invalid request. Modify the request before retry. |
409 |
The request could not be completed due to a conflict with the current state of the resource. The resource that the client attempts to create already exists, or the update request fails to be processed because of a conflict. |
412 |
The server did not meet one of the preconditions contained in the request. |
Error Codes
See Error Codes.
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Provide feedbackThank you very much for your feedback. We will continue working to improve the documentation.