更新时间:2024-07-01 GMT+08:00
案例:改写SQL消除子查询(案例1)
现象描述
1 2 3 4 |
select 1, (select count(*) from customer_address_001 a4 where a4.ca_address_sk = a.ca_address_sk) as GZCS from customer_address_001 a; |
此SQL性能较差,查看发现执行计划中存在SubPlan,引用SubPlan结果的算子可能需要反复的调用获取这个SubPlan的值,即SubPlan以下的结果要重复执行很多次。具体如下:
优化说明
此优化的核心就是消除子查询。那么从SQL语义出发,可以等价改写SQL为:
1 2 3 4 5 6 |
select 1, coalesce(a4.c1, 0) from (select count(*) c1, a4.ca_address_sk from customer_address_001 a4 group by a4.ca_address_sk) a4 right join customer_address_001 a on a4.ca_address_sk = a.ca_address_sk; |
父主题: 实际调优案例