Comparison Between DDS and On-Premises Databases
DDS provides high availability. It is more reliable, secure, and cost-effective than self-built databases.
Item |
DDS |
On-Premises Database |
---|---|---|
Service availability |
99.95% |
Requires setting up the primary/standby relationship and HA environment for ensuring the availability. |
Data durability |
99.99999999% |
Requires self-guarantee, primary/standby relationship setup, and RAID setup. |
System security |
|
|
Database backup |
|
|
Monitoring and alarm reporting |
DDS interconnects with Cloud Eye, which provides a visualized platform for you to view monitoring metrics and set threshold alarms. |
You have to purchase three servers and hosting fees can be expensive. |
Hosting |
There are no hosting fees. |
Requires purchase of three servers and payment of high hosting fees. |
Maintenance cost |
There are no additional O&M costs, and second-by-second performance monitoring, threshold alarms, and event alarms can all be configured. |
Requires a lot of workforce investment and professional database administrator (DBA) for maintenance. |
Deployment and scaling |
Supports quick deployment, flexible application, elastic scaling, and one-click specification change. |
Requires procurement, deployment, and coordination of hardware that matches original devices. |
Log transfer |
Stores slow query logs and error logs for one month. |
Requires you to transfer, export, and query log information on your own. |
High availability |
Provides high availability capabilities, supporting second-level switchover and failover. |
Requires self-setup of HA monitoring. Data may be lost after a manual primary/secondary switchover is performed using commands. |
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Provide feedbackThank you very much for your feedback. We will continue working to improve the documentation.See the reply and handling status in My Cloud VOC.
For any further questions, feel free to contact us through the chatbot.
Chatbot