Product Series
- Single-node
- Primary/Standby
|
DB Instance Type |
Description |
Notes |
Scenarios |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Single-node |
A single-node architecture is more cost-effective than a primary/standby DB pair. |
If a fault occurs on a single-node instance, the instance cannot recover in a timely manner. |
|
|
Primary/Standby |
An HA architecture. A pair of primary and standby instances shares the same IP address and can be deployed in different AZs. |
|
|
Comparison
- Single-node instances: Different from primary/standby instances that have two database nodes, a single-node instance has only one node, reducing the price to half of a primary/standby instance. If the node fails, the restoration will take a long time. Therefore, single-node instances are not recommended for workloads that are highly sensitive to database availability.
- Primary/Standby instances: use the standby database node only for failover and restoration. The standby database node does not provide services. If the primary node fails, the standby node can take over services immediately. Since standby nodes cause extra performance overhead, the performance of single-node instances is similar to or even higher than primary/standby instances.
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Provide feedbackThank you very much for your feedback. We will continue working to improve the documentation.See the reply and handling status in My Cloud VOC.
For any further questions, feel free to contact us through the chatbot.
Chatbot