Comparison Between DDS and On-Premises Databases
DDS provides high availability. It is more reliable, secure, and cost-effective than self-built databases.
Item |
DDS |
On-Premises Database |
---|---|---|
Service availability |
99.95% |
Requires setting up the primary/standby relationship and HA environment for ensuring the availability. |
Data durability |
99.99999999% |
Requires self-guarantee, primary/standby relationship setup, and RAID setup. |
System security |
|
|
Database backup |
|
|
Monitoring and alarm reporting |
DDS interconnects with Cloud Eye, which provides a visualized platform for you to view monitoring metrics and set threshold alarms. |
You have to purchase three servers and hosting fees can be expensive. |
Hosting |
There are no hosting fees. |
Requires purchase of three servers and payment of high hosting fees. |
Maintenance cost |
There are no additional O&M costs, and second-by-second performance monitoring, threshold alarms, and event alarms can all be configured. |
Requires large manpower investment and professional database administrator (DBA) for maintenance. |
Deployment and scaling |
Supports quick deployment, flexible application, elastic scaling, and one-click specification change. |
Requires procurement, deployment, and coordination of hardware that matches original devices. |
Log transfer |
Stores slow query logs and error logs for one month. |
Requires you to transfer, export, and query log information on your own. |
High availability |
Provides high availability capabilities, supporting second-level switchover and failover. |
Requires self-setup of HA monitoring. Data may be lost after a manual primary/secondary switchover is performed using commands. |
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Provide feedbackThank you very much for your feedback. We will continue working to improve the documentation.