Comparison Between DDS and On-Premises Databases
DDS provides high availability. It is more reliable, secure, and cost-effective than self-built databases.
| Item | DDS | On-Premises Database |
|---|---|---|
| Service availability | 99.95% | Requires setting up the primary/standby relationship and HA environment for ensuring the availability. |
| Data durability | 99.99999999% | Requires self-guarantee, primary/standby relationship setup, and RAID setup. |
| System security |
|
|
| Database backup |
|
|
| Monitoring and alarm reporting | DDS interconnects with Cloud Eye, which provides a visualized platform for you to view monitoring metrics and set threshold alarms. | You have to purchase three servers and hosting fees can be expensive. |
| Hosting | There are no hosting fees. | Requires purchase of three servers and payment of high hosting fees. |
| Maintenance cost | There are no additional O&M costs, and second-by-second performance monitoring, threshold alarms, and event alarms can all be configured. | Requires large labor investment and professional database administrator (DBA) for maintenance. |
| Deployment and scaling | Supports quick deployment, flexible application, elastic scaling, and one-click specification change. | Requires procurement, deployment, and coordination of hardware that matches original devices. |
| Log transfer | Stores slow query logs and error logs for one month. | Requires you to transfer, export, and query log information on your own. |
| High availability | Provides high availability capabilities, supporting second-level switchover and failover. | Requires self-setup of HA monitoring. Data may be lost after a manual primary/secondary switchover is performed using commands. |
Feedback
Was this page helpful?
Provide feedbackThank you very much for your feedback. We will continue working to improve the documentation.